The political, social networking site that integrates politics with popular culture.

Avatar of Brandon Killian
Brandon Killian @brandonkillian 6 years, 6 months ago

I believe the US should take the role that the International community takes. We are not the world police, it is not our duty to intervene in every international crisis. Of course, the use of chemical weapons is extremely regrettable. I think the International community should ABSOLUTELY take action, but an effort by the United States alone to oust the Assad Regime would engage us in another costly war with little results. We are involved in so many International conflicts right now, and we have problems of our own to face in the United States. Lets stop being the world police and encourage a UN resolution. The International community must work together to hold the Assad Regime, and other dictatorships accountable.

Avatar of Two Cents
Two Cents @twocents 6 years, 6 months ago

I support setting up some sort of safe zone for rebels. Although, I do not support military combat actions. They will most likely fail. Also, at this point the rebels have mixed with groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood. If we supply them with weapons there is no way to track where these weapons could end up. Its too late to get involved now, all we can do is provide humanitarian aid, such as setting up a safe zone.

Avatar of nathalie
nathalie @nathaliedacosta 6 years, 6 months ago

@juliawotten What steps do you think need to be taken to encourage international communication on the issue? What is your opinion about Russia’s support of Assad, and how would that factor into the international effort?

Avatar of Isabelle Granter
Isabelle Granter @issabell 6 years, 6 months ago

We absolutely have an obligation to bolster the syrian revolution — even if our role as world police is winding down (as it should be!), it doesn’t change the fact that we set a boundary, and Assad crossed it.

Avatar of Andrew
Andrew @smittyboss1 6 years, 6 months ago

We said that chemical weapons were the line. Assad crossed it. We need to support the rebels now. Arms and money. If the international community doesn’t like it, so what? What will they do? Since when has America listened to other countries trying to dictate what WE, America, do?

Avatar of Danny Foster
Danny Foster @dannyfoster 6 years, 6 months ago

@andrew what about the danger that weapons could fall into the wrong hands?

Avatar of Terry Jung
Terry Jung @classikjane 6 years, 6 months ago

Hard question. Good discussion. Issue is further complicated by Syrian army crossing into Israel & the border war heating up there. Chemical weapons are unacceptable. From international reporting I have read, both Assad and rebels are torturing each other’s captives. Bombing chemical weapons delivery systems may help; I wouldn’t put US troops on the ground there.

Avatar of Jared Howell
Jared Howell @theteddsickgnasty 6 years, 6 months ago

I’m just going to point out that no one in the Syrian conflict is completely innocent and there have been reports that the rebels may at one point also had Sarin gas. If the U.S. is going to get involved in this conflict it should be making sure this conflict doesn’t spill over into Turkey, Lebanon, or Israel. If N.A.T.O. wants to set up a no fly zone I’m fine with that, but getting involved in any other way will be a huge mistake.

Avatar of
Anonymous @ 6 years, 6 months ago

Almost all of our allies in the Middle East wants our help… and right now we’re basically ignoring them. Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Isreal, Jordan, Egypt…they all want us to intervene in Syria with the hopes that our help will stop this war. So, it’s clear that we must do something. But we have to be careful here, really careful. If Iraq and Afghanistan are any indication, let it be for what NOT to do and let’s begin to adopt policies of containment and alleviation such as protecting the innocent civilians as well as governance support.


You must be logged in to reply to this topic.